|
|
| ||||||||||||||
The devices can determine the age of the buyer as the skin on the face. Wanting to buy cigarettes should look into the camera built assault rifle and press this button. The machine will analyze provisanie skin and wrinkles on the face, and within three seconds ascertain whether the buyer has reached the age that would buy "sticks of death". 
During the testing machine company Fujitaka for 500 volunteers aged 10 to 69 years found that the machine determines the true age in 90% of cases. In the first year, sales of new items Fujitaka expects to realize about 10 thousand of these machines. The positive impact of clear - gay would not be able to etch themselves and nicotine gum because of the negligence of working booths. Conversely - the author of these lines in his 21 would not have to go home yet again without cigarettes with the idea "but as I looked at 17." Now, the conclusions of the age will do an objective machine. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of a contact man-machine raises some doubts. When the progress achieved Driver, and alcohol in the blood became determined not commonplace "dyhni" rather spetsalnymi devices discovered errors in a programmatic side. The same goes for the radar to detect speeding. 
The idea of "reading" people are not too copes with the reality. Thus, the matching digital photo biopasportah fotobazami criminals with no results if people in the photo smiles. Nevertheless, marketing, and developers continue to wear it. For example, using the cameras they are trying to identify emotions on the faces of "delicacy" new yoghurt and magic "mirror" know people and show them personalized advertising. Overall, it would be much better if the Japanese have invented a smart machine for throwing smoke - especially to Russia, where smoking every second. Yes, and the Americans who, because of a single cigarette lost through high-speed network between New York and Boston, it would have been retained. Hollywood is coming under heavy pressure to crack down on smoking in the movies, rattled by a big-money PR campaign and new research showing that teenagers who watch actors light up are significantly more likely to do so themselves. The entertainment trade paper Variety reported that the Motion Picture Association of America is considering ways to limit depictions of smoking as part of a larger effort to shore up support for the movie ratings system, which has come under criticism almost from its inception nearly 40 years ago. The idea is that where there’s less smoke, there’s less fire. “There’s a clear link between the percentage of characters who smoke in films and the rate of youth smoking,” Patrick Reynolds, president of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free America, said Tuesday.  A study published last week in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine found that white teenagers who frequently watch R-rated movies are almost seven times more likely to start smoking than those who don’t. The study, conducted by researchers at the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation at the University of North Carolina, did not find a similar correlation among black teenagers. But two previous studies, in 2003 and 2005, did find one, and the North Carolina team concluded that the three studies demonstrated a strong link between celluloid smoking and teen smoking. “The tobacco industry has specifically targeted these images to children as young as 12 or 13 years of age,” said Dr. Jonathan Klein, director of the Center on Children and Smoking of the American Pediatrics Association. “Most adolescents who smoke know they’re addicted, and they want to quit, and yet 1 in 3 of these children will go on to die of a tobacco-related illness.” That’s why the pediatrics academy wants the MPAA to slap an automatic R rating on any new film depicting smoking, he said. The idea to impose the R rating, which restricts the freedom of children under 16 from seeing certain films, comes from the Smoke Free Movies Initiative at the University of California-San Francisco. It has been endorsed in a coordinated campaign bankrolled with $500,000 from the American Legacy Foundation, the anti-smoking organization that was created by the 1999 settlement of a massive federal lawsuit against the tobacco companies. In addition to the pediatrics academy, the campaign has been joined by the American Medical Association, the World Health Organization and more than a dozen other groups. The idea lit up Gary Nolan, a spokesman for the Smoker’s Club, a smoker’s-right group. “This is political correctness run amok, frankly,” said Nolan, who dismissed evidence of any link between smoking in the media and smoking by youths. “As a kid I watched Tom and Jerry, and I watched them throw each other off buildings, throw each other in front of automobiles, beat each other up with hammers and frying pans, and all of that is going to be OK,” Nolan said Tuesday. “But lo and behold, should anyone light up a cigar or a cigarette or a pipe, now we’re in trouble.” Preventing youth smoking “is not the job of the government or of the motion picture industry, but it is the job of parents, who have the most influence over their children, and I think it’s time to put that responsibility back in their lap,” he said. How many times have we heard that ventilation systems ‘do not work’ when it comes to the removal of passive smoking? Thousands. Here is visual proof of the umpteenth lie of Tobacco Control. In reality Tobacco Control knows damn well that ventilation systems work perfectly. TC knows that, thanks to those systems, the air in a smoking environment is actually cleaner than outside air. Finally, TC is perfectly aware that, regardless of the efficiency of those systems, exposure to passive smoking is not and never has been a legitimate issue, because the quantity of toxic substances, even in very smoky rooms, is ridiculously small. The "no effective ventilation" lie is necessary for the social engineering program to “make it difficult” for smokers to smoke so that they quit. As they are “addicted”, however, they can only quit with smoking cessation “therapies” produced by Big Pharma. It is therefore logical – in a criminal way, of course – to deny the evidence that modern ventilation systems are perfectly adequate to remove over 99% of ETS, and state instead that “there is no safe level of exposure to passive smoking," so that even one harmless molecule is too much. That fits perfectly with the sick and fanatical ideology of Tobacco Control, as we know – and can allow bullshitters such as James Repace to say that it takes tornadoes to remove passive smoking! | ||||||||||||||